RNC BLOGGERS
Stumble This Reading Wizbang! , I found the RNC Blogger blogroll code and added it to BIRD (left-hand column), but they don't have any icon or image/button yet to accompany their blogroll group, with a site planned, as per what Wizbang! writes, so I designed something as a starting point, as follows:
Incorporating the existing, "official" RNC 2004 Convention logo (some retouching inorder to clear up the small file size type smudges) --
Vertical logo versions
(1.) "WHITETYPE" Bloggers
100 pixels wide (smallest file size):
158 pixels wide:
250 pixels wide (largest file size):
(2.) "GREYTYPE" Bloggers
100 pixels wide (smallest file size):
158 pixels wide:
250 pixels wide (largest file size):
I did not design the original RNC 2004 Convention logo(s) and so the "blogger" adaptation versions here are donated by me for use by Republican bloggers on individual sites.
3 COMMENTS
SEARCH
ABOUT THIS ENTRY
This page contains a single entry by -S- published on August 12, 2004 5:55 AM.
FIRES AND MORE FIRES was the previous entry in this blog.
"JOHN KERRY'S BODYGUARD OF LIES" is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the MAIN INDEX or look in the ARCHIVES to find all content.
hehehehehehe
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/12/politics/campaign/12memo.html?ei=5006&en=eb7afee5adb68857&ex=1092974400&partner=ALTAVISTA1&pagewanted=print&position=
This post has been removed by the author.
There are so many inconsistencies and foolish concepts in those quotes by the Democrats in that article -- Kerry but also Biden and the advisor, Beers -- that I could devote an hour or so to nearly each and every one, much less the combination of the "Kerry message" as non-message.
But, hehehehehe works very well, too!
~;-D
Those few quotes (article, your link) alone provide a very good description as to what Kerry doesn't mean by meaning nothing and everything at any one point about all of it but only a part of it upon closer examination, afterward.
That part by Beers (his hypothetical "point five"), is absurd, saying, "If you want to add a fifth, it's going to war without examining the quality of your intelligence" and obviously implying by counter example that the Bush Administration DIDN'T "examine the quality of...intelligence", is wretchedly illogical, beyond acceptable from someone who is supposedly a security advisor, as is Beers.
If it'd been Kerry in office (or Gore, or even Biden, or others) on 09/12/200THREE, they'd still be "examining the intelligence" and ruminating about why to go, not go, looking for "allied" support, trying to "reason with" Saddam...and God knows what else might have taken place in the U.S. after 09/11 because of that "strategy" of generalities to the point of absurdity.
I mean, drag around if you want to, need to, but for a President of the U.S., it's not an admirable or even desirable quality.
Liberals attack the issue of "war" as being "bad" but refuse to examine survival and how to do it, instead relying on some generalized social ideologies as "salvation" or method to solve. You can TRY to share your sensitive ideology with a rabid animal, but eventually you have to withdraw your hand and try another tactic if you want to avoid catching whatever problem that rabid animal has. Same thing applies to humans who are capable of acts such as took place on 09/11, before that and afterward elsewhere.
--------