ABU GHRAIB PART DEUX?
SITE EDIT, 12/10/07 - This entry is from former site contributor, "justaguy", whose author title isn't recreated on these republished posts of his after the site was upgraded to the use of MT 4.0 (his work was successfully reimported and republished but his User Account was not, and, thus, this manual edit to identify the contributions on this blog by "justaguy".
--------------------------------------------------------------
Photos have surfaced of Navy SEALs within Iraq nabbing various Hussein allies, etc.
According to the AP story...
"An Associated Press reporter found more than 40 of the pictures among hundreds in an album posted on a commercial photo-sharing Web site by a woman who said her husband brought them from Iraq after his tour of duty. It is unclear who took the pictures, which the Navy said it was investigating after the AP furnished copies to get comment for this story."
I'm starting to believe we need classify personal cameras on the frontlines (among soldiers) as contraband. Some individuals within the media are labeling this "Abu Ghraib Part 2." From my examination of the initial set of photos...I see no clear signs of abuse. If "posing" is considered abuse...then we need to launch an investigation into this photo.
On a website that I frequent someone asked why the Navy SEALs had put one particular prisoner within a "dress."
It isn't a dress...it's sleepwear/underwear...sometimes worn beneath Galabiyyas.
My educated guess is that the picture was taken near the holy city of Karbala in about April of 2003. If I remember correctly...one photo was time stamped May 2003. That particular wear is worn beneath Galabiyyas...which are typically worn in holy cities. If I remember correctly...U.S. Special Forces were pushing towards Baghdad...and were making raids in Karbala at this time (April)...if I also remember correctly a Black Hawk went down during this time...Black Hawks are typically used to transport various Special Forces.
On a side note...Balaclavas should be standard issue for all Iraqi National Guard troops....I hope we start destroying more...not just to their Special Forces...it might curb retaliatory attacks from Baathists and foreign terrorists.
-- justaguy
--------------------------------------------------------------
(Editor's Note: this thread was authored by Contributing Writer justaguy at a time when site commenting did not include an author byline in the default publishing; however, after the template was corrected and an author byline in the default publishing template/s -- and the site republished afterward -- all threads authored by justaguy were republished inaccurately as being from me [ byline, " -S- " ] because it was I who republished the full site contents; apologies to justaguy and to readers for any misunderstanding.)
Stumble This 
REFERENCE
Excellent interpretation and response you have written here, justaguy, about this issue. Not to diminish the problems from Abu Gharaib, but this latest thing seems more an issue that certain media really NEEDS to discredit American forces, more than American forces merit being discredited.
I was listening earlier to CNN (because I am still away and limited to CNN and MSNBC as to network news, unfortunately for me) and announcer after announcer just...has...to...present...the...Bush...Cabinet changes as being something strange or abnormal or something in similar context to 'rats leaving a sinking ship' or thereabouts, when, in fact, the Cabinet turnover in this second Bush term is, so far, less than what took place in Clinton's (I believe that's accurate), and also in comparison with other Presidency's, the Cabinet turnover underway is very much 'normal' and not at all unusual for a second term Presidency. But, to listen to CNN, each and every mention of this issue is led with some negative introduction coupled with a negative tone of voice by the announcer, as if, well, isn't this --awful-- and thereabouts, such that by the time you hear the facts as to the Cabinet changes, you are ready to believe that it's very bad news, very bad, indeed, based upon how the information has been presented.
So, your analysis of this news is very much levelling and appreciated. That photo of Saddam's capture is priceless.