"WHO SQUEALED?"

EDITOR'S NOTE: The following site and site address are not endorsed nor acceptable to this website as to that website's content, message or theme -- and, it seems to be a radical Islamacist from the U.K. who has written above comments. Because this website, BIRD, regards that website (radical Islamacist's website, "opinionated...") as offensive in nature (as it also appears there was an attempt to hitch a link to this website for other purposes), hyperlink information has been removed by this website (no assistance is provided here for anyone to access that website from this one for these reasons).

(ED. NOTE Continued): OBJECTIONABLE COMMENTS FOLLOW with this site's striking of terms it is believed have been left here as an attempt to include this site, inaccurately, in Search-Engine results for the offensive terminology used in the comments themselves by "jamal". This site doesn't engage in internet warfare and I am consistently disappointed in corrupt individuals who attempt to use the internet for their destructive and corrupt purposes ("jamal" is a good example of that bad behavior to this site's view).

(Ed. NOTE Continued): OBJECTIONABLE COMMENTS BEGIN, links scrubbed:

Propogating the “Final Solution”, his words are extreme, but Kambon does however make some interesting points. Lets not forget that similar views to Kambon’s also exist amongst those he condemns. (ED. NOTE HERE striking the following -- >> Many White Supremist, Right-Wing and other groups argue similar points, but receive much less publicity. There is state sponsored genocide and segration evident in places such as Iraq, Sudan and Palestine, while blacks are concentrated in the countless inner-city slums of the West.

Kambon is gravely wrong to generalise an entire race in this manner, but lets not pretend there are not prevalent groups throughout the world and issues particularly in Africa, which evidence the “international plantation” for blacks and that; “You’re either supporting .. people in their process of death, or you’re for African liberation.” What Kambon conveniently ignores is that there are black “plantation masters” also!

(ED.NOTE, Again: striking link -- >> opinionated.blogsome.com

I'm no expert or even moderately familiar academic about White Supremacists, but from the bit I've happened upon from their statements, they advise and advocate SEPARATISM from blacks and other races, not the EXTERMINATION of other races.

Such that, I've only heard this outcry -- for the "extermination of white people" (or any group of persons based upon racial type) -- from Hitler and his National Socialist Party in history's past as to the Jews (and many others, although little publicised).

It's the "extermination" outcry that is the extreme here as to Kambon's statements and can't be compared to any others, to my knowledge, other than with Muslim extremists, who make a similar outcry (and as do several black leaders who are Muslim, who advise that "white people" are "devils" and such and require death for some [cryptic, deranged] 'spiritual' necessity) and with Nazism.

It's erroneous to pass off this crazy person's comments (Kambon's) as being equal to extreme groups because the advocacy of "extermination" based upon skin type -- which Kambon is advocating and from and with the advantage of a public teaching position at that -- is as extreme (only) as was Hitler's and Islamo fundamentalists' (both of which determined that their ideology was dependent upon "exterminating" other peoples based upon racial and/or religious beliefs -- Christians, particularly, most of whom are "white people").

But, you are right as to noticing Kambon's failure to recognize "black plantation owners" in his mumbojumbo, evil nonsense. In fact, it's the height of racism that Kambon does advocate: not accepting/acknoledging that black people, too, can be and are everything "white people" can and have been. That's the issue right there of importance that Kambon buries in his need to express his mental, emotional and spiritual sickness.

Additionally, you wrote, as to Kambon's outcry for "the extermination of white people":

>>"Many White Supremist, Right-Wing and other groups argue similar points, but receive much less publicity."

Nothing could be farther from the truth and more heinous a misstatement as that. What "many" "White Supremacist, Right-Wing and other groups" are you referring to? Because, I've yet to ever read of ANY "White Supremacist, Right-Wing and other groups" who argue for Kambon's goals. With the exception of Nazism and Muslim groups, I've never heard or read of any such calling. And Saddam Hussein, who also attempted ethnic exterminations based upon his insane version of dictatorship, although I don't know to what extent his insanity includes ethnic exterminations so much as it included "kingdom" boundaries of control.

"Right-Wing" groups in Western culture are generally based in Christianity -- as in conservativism, people who live by a code of ethics based upon a religious ideology as founding principles -- and reference and advocate Christian morality. It is not Christians who are advocating for "extermination" of any other peoples not of their own beliefs, for example. Muslims (some) do so advocate and as does Kambon. It seems an effort by Islam to eradicate those who they determine to be living differently, and, therefore, living by choice according to beliefs other than Islam -- to Islam, threatening to Islam -- and Islam includes other racial types in that threat level particularly, as they do, also, those as I wrote earlier who believe in other religious beliefs other than Islam. Christians, Jews, for example, are deemed disposable by Islam based upon religious ideology (by Muslims) that deems Christianity and Judao-Christianity a problem to the dogma of Islam.

And, to be clear here, Hitler and his German Socialist Party and the Nazis related to both may have been 'white' (Northern European, mostly -- although it's now known that Hitler had partial Jewish ancestry, unbelievable as that now seems), they were not, not at all, Christian.

The Nazis were rooted in pagan mysticism and all sorts of devination and occult acts and beliefs and did not represent nor abide by Christian beliefs. Again, not all "white people" were included in that and that dreadful movement was first born in liberal, socialist Berlin, which is the polar opposite of "right-wing" generalities.

Throughout time, many secular groups of humans have banded together and sought out security from threat of others by way of isolation and separatism and there's nothing new or horrific about that behavior in and of itself. Gated communities come to mind here, as do door locks in contemporary and far more intensely populated areas. But seeking security by way of chosing where one lives and with whom one associates does not inherently define someone or a group of people who seek to eradicate others outside their circle of trust. THAT takes a shared ideology that requires "exterminating" other people inorder to proliferate and protect an ideology. And THAT behavior is very rare but certainly the most offensive imaginable to most human beings of all ideologies who do not advocate eradicating other human beings (again, Christianity as ideology does not advocate any such thing).

ALSO, you wrote: "blacks congregated in countless (American) inner city slums..."

People with low incomes seek low income housing. A lot of that in the rental market is found in "inner cities" or cities in general. And, a lot of "black people" culturally seek out their own kind for neighborhoods -- among other factors, it's a cultural choice by many to live in higher numbers among others similar. POINT IS is that this represents an individual choice, not one organized by "white people" in some attempt to do away with others and such. But individiual exercise of choice to live wherever because of whatever. Anyone can always, in the U.S., leave bad neighborhoods or stay in them and begin to change them for the better, but it isn't a case of "inner city slums" being "plantation"-type organizations comprised of persons incarcerated or otherwise held by forces they are not without opportuniities/possibilities to change by individual effort.