SANDY BERGER AGAIN CLOGS CLINTON CREDIBILITY

More accurately, the Clintons continue to clog their own credibility, but they also seem to think that by hammering on through incredible gaffs, their credibility will somehow improve; they deploy the "hiding in plain sight" methodology whatever their foolery is, may be and has been.

However, calling "it" -- the Clinton politics and methods -- "foolery" is just too lenient, too kind, too fluffy to accurately describe their deeds.

Sandy Berger was rolled into Hillary and Bill's 2008 Presidential campaign a while ago but the news only gained mainstream foothold yesterday. A commentor mentioned an earlier article about Berger in relationship to the Clinton campaign on POLITICO a few days ago and the national news picked it up from there, that Sandy Berger was named by Hillary Clinton as "special advisor" to her campaign. Today Hillary (and Bill) maintain they "have a lot of friends" and "a lot of people advise" the/their campaign/s. Lalalalalala.

Sandy Berger, in statements made in 2003 and in sworn testimony in 2004 before the 911 Commission, said that he "did not have anything in (his) pants" when questioned about classified documents he cryptically removed from the National Archive -- specifically although a copy, a copy bearing original notes by former President Bill Clinton that directly involves his questionable interactions as to our U.S. national security.

Berger's attorney later declared that Berger DID have documents in his pants, among other areas on or attached to his body, but, oh, lalalalala. The Justice Department let Berger slip by without jail time but jail time he deserved, as does whoever motivated Berger to make these thefts (my guess is the Clintons - one, both). But, lalalalala, Bill Clinton responded in that staccato false laugh he uses (as does Hillary deploy her cackle), saying that Berger was known to be "disorganized" and laughed about what Clinton referred to as Berger's goofiness, lalalalalala, no harm there, he's an entertaining boob, as Liberals try to minimize his behaviors, lalalalalala.

But if you doubt my word for it, read the facts, read the news:

SANDY BERGER: WHAT DID HE TAKE AND WHY DID HE TAKE IT?

SANDY BERGER and THE CLINTON COVER-UP - WHY IT MATTERS (via noliberalspin.townhall.com):

You really have to wonder why Sandy Burgular gave up his law license so quickly to avoid an investigation into his nefarious activities in the National Archives! What WAS that masked man up to? Why did Bubba erupt like Vesuvius when Chris Wallace merely touched on the subject? Like a lion with a thorn in his paw, Bubba roared that Chris and the right-wing were out to get him, etc...

EXCERPT:

On May 17th, Sandy Berger, President Bill Clinton's National Security Adviser, voluntarily gave up his law license and with it the right to practice law. That is a stunning move for an accomplished lawyer, one of the nation's most influential public officials. Someone should take note. In fact, everyone should.

"Ordinarily, anyone who has spent the time, effort, and money needed to master one of the 'learned professions' fights with the utmost determination to keep his license. That is not merely a ticket to practice your chosen profession - it is also a badge of honor and accomplishment. Ask any doctor or lawyer, any architect or CPA, any professional at all, what it means to give that up.

That Berger didn't fight speaks volumes.

TIMELINE of Sandy Burgular's activities.

1. When caught, he first blamed Archives employees for misplacing the documents.

2. Then he admitted having taken them inadvertently (this is the point at which he cut the plea deal).

3. Finally, Sandy Burgular acknowledged that he intentionally removed and destroyed documents BUT ONLY after the investigation began to reveal that Sandy Burgular had removed and destroyed them.

SANDY BERGER - SERIOUSLY, SANDY BERGER?

SANDY BERGER'S HEAVY LIFTING

The Clintons change clothes and hope you won't notice their pants:
Sandy Berger's an official advisor and then he's merely a friend and an advisor when he's not merely a friend advising another one, depending, of course, on what the meaning of the word, "is" is.