OBAMABONICS ON THE SPIT, PART ONE
Stumble This "ARE DEMS TALKING ABOUT McCAIN'S AGE IN CODE?"
Yes, yes they are.
Though I would relegate the talk they're talking to Obamabonics and not to "code," because, this is the latest translation of the same old language and the language is the thing, that's the thing to analyze.
For those who hunt, are keen in perceptions as to what sounds mean what, what's being roasted and crackles, spits and puffs away is today's Obamabonics that's replaced yesterday's Kerry Kuts and Gore's flaming. But it's the same misleading language, just today with a different accent: Obamabonics, "code speak" for "I support but I deny."
The code-speak applies like marrow keeps a bone together (albeit, an ill bone with dubious filling), but, binding and filler, the speak is there for the observant: "say it, betray it" and "uphold it, scold it."
As to John McCain's age, yes, of course the Democrats are ridiculing John McCain's age -- it's all-the-heck everywhere on the internet, for starters, it's sprinkled all over and in whatever Democrats dish-out, it's impossible not to step in it all over the place. Obama says it, the Democrats betray it, Obama upholds it, the Democrats scold it (and far worse), and then Obama gets to laugh among his more predictable crowds (San Francisco, Chicago, Democrat legislators, segregated supporters, Wright's "church", etc.) that it is, after all, an aged competitor, poured out like bad wine by Obama with that indecent, false laugh.
What it is is dishonest speech, reflective of bad character. I don't expect too much more this year from the Left, but, in Obama's case, he's got this code-speak language thing down badly because he leaves crumbs all.over.the.place and the rest of us would have to be blind and deaf not to read and hear it.
Unfortunately for our nation and this world, the limitations of youth -- despite youth's abundancy otherwise -- are that they learn by failure when they survive failure and what hasn't yet been proven to fail, they often follow. It's why they can be so easily led astray and all of us who are now older were once younger and that's why those of us who've survived to older ages keep an eye and ear out because we know that some of those sounds are by predators, or, by bad things that bring youth to an end.
Select above image to view larger file size.
1 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: OBAMABONICS ON THE SPIT, PART ONE.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.suzyrice.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/1014
Al Gore and Obama share a hug-a-lie: (Gore) (hugging Obama in Michigan after endorsing him) said Republicans criticized President Kennedy for being too young and inexperienced to be president... So the meme of the last hour is that Obama's synonymous ... Read More
2 COMMENTS
SEARCH
ABOUT THIS ENTRY
This page contains a single entry by -S- published on June 16, 2008 9:37 PM.
FATHER'S DAY - REMEMBERING MINE was the previous entry in this blog.
OBAMABONICS ON ACID is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the MAIN INDEX or look in the ARCHIVES to find all content.
I am the director of a social education project called 'children of the code' ([Ed. Note: website url removed to prevent site link]). It is a completely non-partisan project concerned with the 'code' of writing and how protracted difficulties associated with learning to read it are significantly diminishing the lives of about 100 million Americans. The site is frequented by members of both political parties.
I wish you had taken the time to do a simple search on the term 'children of the code' because your cheap shot use of it here could result in diminishing its meaning and thereby harming an effort that even the most anti-Obama factions could otherwise appreciate.
I can only hope that your dark satire will be panned and that in the future you and others like you will become a bit more conscientious before plastering other people's keyword names in your cartoonish attacks.
Please note that if you've visited this site before and deposited previous comments here, all comments and user IPAs are saved by this site for future reference.
Whoa, you're accusing ME because you've created an entirely self-focused non-reality on my use of mere words here? You're projecting some ownership of "keywords" onto both my cartoon here ("dark" you call it) and suggesting I should suffer negative "consequences" (to be "panned") for mere use of WORDS? You project an organization of your own, individual affiliation onto this silly cartoon I posted here? In the realm of our entire humanity -- me included -- you've randomly found words used on the internet that you then associate with (and only with) some entity of your involvement, you conclude that to be used by any random other person, these words represents some association or comment to or about that organization, just because certain words "match" "words" you assume to control?
I've read some strange projections by others in my lifetime, but these rude comments by you, also outrageously unrealistic and critical of an unusually, unmerited sort, are nearing the lowest.
Nowhere in this cartoon (or in words) on this site exists any reference to any specific group in reality and that includes the group you've appeared here and identified. I make no reference to, comment about, point no readers to, nor call into question YOUR organization ("[Ed.Note: url removed to prevent site link]" as you here, now, identify it) nor that domain name you've identified here, nor website, nor anything remotely related to you as director of whatever or either/any of that.
The cartoon here is a parody of a film poster for "Children of the Corn," which was a film adapted from a book of fiction written by Steven King.
Since Obama's political and social efforts target and rely on the impressionability of youth via personality and celebrity appeal more than substance, the latest identified actions by the Obama Democrats -- to smear McCain as to his age, also to smear he and hiw wife based upon physical limitations if not disabilities as to his wife's by way of referring "in code speak" to age and physical handicaps/limitations by a "backdoor" method of speech -- is, in fact, worthy of being ridiculed as I've done here. The POLITICS and POLITICAL METHOD are worthy of being ridiculed, not Stephen King, not the film, not the poster created for the film, certainly not the "words" used in the film's title nor my parody OF any/all of that. Nor are the words, to my knowledge, which exist in our common, English language, owned as words in language are used by anyone else in any other, alternative order or phrasing as I have here.
This cartoon has nothing to do with you, your organization or any website. If you project some nonexistent association or implication in those regards, that's a statement of your own strange state of mind and does not represent a realistic perception as to my site and the content posted here.
There's no reason that I'd want to "do research" either thoroughly or not as to this cartoon -- it's parody on the issues I've just identified (and did in my post accompanying this cartoon), not parody of some "group" I have no idea exists, nor which I've ever discussed (here, anywhere else) nor have plans to at any future time.
If you're troubled by my content, why are you accessing it? And, to also assume such bleak aberrataions of reality as you have and then to suggest I be harmed in some fashion (that I be "panned" for "dark" content), is irrational and reckless.
You are engaged in self-obsession. As here, quoted now from your comments left here a few hours ago: "(that I should...do...research...) before plastering other people's keyword names in your cartoonish attacks."
I'll be more candid, specifically, as to this strange statement by you: "Other people's keyword names..."
About that, I don't read minds and you projecting that some "keyword names" you may possess or otherwise are yours in reference to anything I write here or anywhere else is strange beyond belief. But I note your attempt to create a hyperlink HERE on my site to your website; which hyperlink I've removed. So, thus, attempts to create "relationship" between my site and yours, as you refer to it, is defined by your actions, not mine (my actions prevent that from occuring by removing any possible link to your site).
In fact, I was not aware that "other people" controlled or somehow 'owned' any "keyword names" nor do I know what "keyword names" actually are (nor do I know anyone who does -- no one I know even uses such a term).
I'd say that your comments are the ones that are, indeed, "dark." If you are unable to distinguish between random words and expressions used by other human beings in the course of their activities and what you assume or presume to own and control among words in general, then, well, you've got more problems than me and my blog (and cartoons) can impact or ever want to.