Recently in DEMOCRATS FREAK-OUT

Category

VIDEO report here.

Former Fannie Mae Interim-CEO, Daniel Mudd, declares to the Congressional Black Caucus, and to Barack Obama, that they are (both) "the conscience of Congress and the conscience of Fannie Mae."

Barack Obama received "126,000.00" from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

And, "Barack Obama is the second biggest recipient of political money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the last ten years. And he's only been in Washington for four years." The other individuals in the "top three recipients of political money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac" are Democrats, Chris Dodd and John Kerry.

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac execs now offering advice to Obama

Senator's links to mortgage giants also include campaign contributions

A review of Federal Election Commission records back to 1989 reveals Obama in his three complete years in the Senate is the second largest recipient of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae campaign contributions, behind only Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., the powerful chairman of the Senate banking committee. Dodd was first elected to the Senate in 1980.

According to OpenSecrets.com, from 1989 to 2008, Dodd received $165,400 in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac campaign contributions, including contributions from PACs and individuals, followed by Obama, who received $126,349 in such contributions since being elected to the Senate in 2004.

In contrast, McCain warned of the coming mortgage crisis as he pressed in 2005 for regulatory reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (Read the full article...)

I'm suggesting readers go to Michelle Malkin's site and access the resources there about this rangey issue. And the story behind the hacking.

I write "rangey" as to this issue because the hacking of Sarah Palin's private email account -- a criminal offense and I hope the offending criminals get a heavy-handed dose of legal remedies applied to them -- appears to involve the same general group of Leftists on the internet who have been harassing the public for a long time now, nearly everywhere any opinion is contributed that isn't among the Far-Left kind, and certainly as to Conservatives and tose who discuss Conservative opinions.

It's becoming easy to spot these offenders: they suggest or allude to private information associated with otherwise public, non-disclosing online identities and they create websites and forums for that purpose, making baseless, disgusting allegations as to those they target. In my experience (having been targeted before by such activity online), the predominant motive shared by this criminal behavior or borderline criminal offensiveness is to harass and harm anyone who does't support "'gay' marriage," who is Christian and/or trends toward the Conservative in life and opinions, certainly as to anyone not voting for the Left.

But make no mistake: this is criminal activity by those involved, and I include the naming of a few high-traffic websites in that, sites that exist to brew the hyperbole involved and keep it agitating. In other words, they're the allegedly credible sites that assist in this sort of defammation and other harms.

Malkin's written a good review of most of this.

Among the most amusing but insane -- certainly desperately irrational -- accusations made by one of the websites involved in this (as also previous) online smear-and-attack efforts by the Left, is this:

Gawker complained that Palin has since "deleted" the (hacked email) account, and suggested she was trying to "destroy evidence."

Meanwhile, let's look at actual destruction of evidence and informatioin trails, and that'd be by the political interests eager to see Palin hacked, abused, harassed and ridiculed, meaning, the Barack Obama Democrats:

Iraqi Billionaire Threatens Reporters Investigating Rezko Affair

...read the whole article, access the links included there, it's time-consuming and a difficult read, but well worth the effort to gain increased insight into the disgusting, abusive world of Barack Obama.

UPDATE:

More droll idiocy from another idiot via domain register "markmonitor.com" -- also registration-home to the ridiculous GAWKER and other pond scum (the "Denton" Spamhole in the ground) -- writing to me from IPA 67.76.202.152 in Indiana ("embarq.com" hosted by "embarqhsd.net" - "Embarq Corporation", Winter Park, FLA if their WHOIS can be believed) . Oh, funny, they write, identify as, "Anonymous" -- and refer to me as "nigger nigger nigger" (<==actual reprint of what "they" wrote).

IP address [?]: 67.76.202.152 [*Whois] (below quoted)

[*Whois]
OrgName: Embarq Corporation
OrgID: EMBAR
Address: 500 N New York Ave
City: Winter Park
StateProv: FL
PostalCode: 32789
Country: US
NetRange: 67.76.0.0 - 67.77.255.255
CIDR: 67.76.0.0/15
NetName: EMBARQ-GLOBAL
NetHandle: NET-67-76-0-0-1
Parent: NET-67-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS9.EMBARQSERVICES.NET
NameServer: NS10.EMBARQSERVICES.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-01-28
Updated: 2007-02-22
OrgTechHandle: ESC36-ARIN
OrgTechName: Embarq Services - CDS
OrgTechPhone: +1-407-741-0500
OrgTechEmail: ipsupport@embarqservices.net
# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2008-09-17 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.

(IP information, continued):
IP address [?]: 67.76.202.152
IP address country: ip address flag United States
IP address state: Indiana
IP address city: Vevay
IP postcode: 47043
IP address latitude: 38.796001
IP address longitude: -85.086304
ISP of this IP [?]: Embarq Corporation
Organization: Embarq Corporation
Host of this IP: [?]: oh-67-76-202-152.sta.embarqhsd.net [Whois]
Local Time of this IP country: 2008-09-18 14:45
[Whois] Information:
Registrant:
Domain Administrator
Embarq
5454 West 110th Street
Overland Park KS 66211
US
domains@embarq.com +1.9133456209 Fax: -
Domain Name: embarqhsd.net
Registrar Name: Markmonitor.com
Registrar Whois: whois.markmonitor.com
Registrar Homepage: http://www.markmonitor.com
Administrative Contact:
Domain Administrator
Embarq
5454 West 110th Street
Overland Park KS 66211
US
domains@embarq.com +1.9133456209 Fax: -
Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Domain Administrator
Embarq
5454 West 110th Street
Overland Park KS 66211
US
domains@embarq.com +1.9133456209 Fax: -
Created on..............: 2006-05-22.
Expires on..............: 2010-05-22.
Record last updated on..: 2008-04-20.
Domain servers in listed order:
ns2.embarqservices.net
ns1.embarqservices.net

This latest message (comment from a few hours ago, trash deposited on this site), refers to me as "nigger nigger nigger". My parents and other ancestors from Northern Europe would find that, also, idiotic, as I do. At least get an insult correct, call me "white person white person white person" and be done with it -- since race seems to be the sticking point by this latest and previous spam and other harassing crud on the internet about me, at least get the "insult" right, since, in my experience, it's "White people" who these crazy spammers and harassers have a problem with.

More indication that the Obama Left is not only desperate, they're depraved. Must be why Hollywood is involved. And other idiots on the inernet.

Some history:

The two Spam memes by idiots about me:

(1.) Accusation about me that I am "nigger nigger nigger" -- their statement in the latest junk message left on this site -- as mirrored by previous (what looks to have been Nick Denton or Denton-affiliated) Spam about me, that whole "Black" thing; and,

(2.) Accusation about me of being "a lesbian" (also involved in [1.] -- this lie about me has been intertwined with the racial denigration many times in spam, referrer spam, insane comments and other derisive, hate-filled Leftist screed about me).

For a group so keen on both those two issues ("racial minoritiies" and "homosexaulity"), the Liberal/Left sure is haplessly unable to restrain themselves from using both contexts to ridicule others, thus rendering their own credibility to be something less than zero.

And, my family surname, "Rice," is the same surname of individuals such as Condoleezza Rice and the abusive "Susan Rice" who rants for Obama and "black people" on HBO and in our government.

Neither of those two persons are related to me, nor vice-versa. There are other "Black people" today whose surnames are, also, "Rice" but they're not relatives of mine, either (nor vice-versa). In the U.S. today, you can find many Black people with English and other European surnames ("Smith," "Jones," "Fleming," "Washington," "Wright," etc.) -- this does not mean that all persons of those surnames are related (no shared ancestry on various later branches of that same family surname), but that at some past point in time, some male with such surname bore a child with a woman who either arrived here from Africa/Middle East or whose ancestors did. Not all males with one surname are actually related, beyond, perhaps, the time of Adam and Eve.

In my ancestry, family history, as to the Rice surname, my branch of relatives (names, dates of birth and death, places of both, spouse and children's names) have been fully identified, including way back to Norman, Celt and Anglo-Saxon years in the British Isles. The "Rice" family name is Welsh, originally, and remains in the U.K. all over Ireland, Wales and England, either known there as "Rice" or "Rhys" -- there's even a Gaelic spelling of the name which remains active in, mostly, Wales. All of those people are and were, "White" or "Caucasian" of the Northern European variety. So am I, then, since these are my ancestors.

Moreover, in my knowledge of the Rice family as my lineage relocated eventually to, first, North America, and, later, established in in our United States of America, the Rice immigration was from Wales, predominantly, and arrived here long enough ago that a lot of generations of branches of the familly surname settled in many parts of North America.

Some remained in the Southeast U.S., where they grew tobacco and other cash-crops. They ALSO "owned" "slaves." That's not unusual in many family histories that span pre-Civil War years.

Someone at some time obvioulsy fathered a child or children with someone "imported from Africa." Which explains Black individuals like Condoleezza Rice, the ranting Susan Rice and a number of other "Black people" today who have the surnames of Northern European and English lineage. My grandmother, whose childhood was lived in the years just after slavery ended -- and whose family did have slaves before that -- told the story that many Blacks who lived as slaves assumed the surnames of those who "owned" them and from whence they later were set free (though some remained on in those same locations, not chosing to leave those areas even after the Civil War, regarding both location and situation as "home" as also the European surname/s they'd assumed). So, just being named "Rice" or anything else does not establish any genetic relationship -- the history of the South and early U.S. is more complicated than that (then there's also the folks who immigrated and whose surnames were rewritten at that time for various reasons).

I've looked at my own family tree, however, and there aren't any branches that were created by a deed or deeds such as that, not among anyone known to be my ancestor (not that there'd be anything wrong with that, except, of course, to the Left who works these racial issues into their useful frenzy). that means, no one of African ancestry was my ancestor (again, except in the context of Adam and Eve).

In the case of individuals such as Condoleezza Rice and the screeching Susan Rice, however, (both of whom are "Black" people), if there's curiosity about their ancestors, go ask either or both of them -- don't ask me because we're not related, I don't have the foggiest idea who their ancestors were but I do know there's no known "shared ancestor" as to any family-branch known to exist between them and me.

Let's look at this more closely:

(1.) If there WAS some "Black woman" somewhere in times past who bore a child or children to a man whose last name was "Rice," whose child or children then grew up to be one of my ancestors, so what? I mean, it wouldn't bother me, I would not be spending any time or concern to either fretting about it or losing any sleep over the idea of such.

But the truth is, there isn't any Negroid ancestry in my family -- in my lineage of ancestry (no "Negroid" mother or father that produced my ancestors). That's the factual report about who my ancestors are, which the Left apparently resents, preposterously, so they lie about me (among other reasons -- don't try to understand the Left's irrationality with reason, however).

Some people with the "Rice" surname in today's media/politics, obviously, do have Negroid ancestry but they're not related to me nor are they members of MY branch of the Rice family. And my branch of the Rice family is well identified by now, so, that whole line of denigration (so the Left tries to use this issue as) is what I'd call a junkyard-variety lie.

(2.) I'm heterosexual. I've never had so much as a fantasy sexually about another woman, I don't desire women sexually, I have no history of "experimentation" sexually with any woman throughout my entire lifetime, there's just nothing there to even associate me, realistically, with anything homosexual. I worked in the entertainment industry and the obvious aspect to and about that is that there are a lot of homosexuals IN that general neighborhood of employment, so, to the Left, it appears, if someone's ever so much as known a homosexual, unless you're Liberal, you "must be one" -- it takes a complete lack of rationality and reason to even try to understand that methodology by the Left, which I think can be boiled down to they're insane and demand everyone else be insane, too . So that's another junkyard-variety lie by the Left about me.

I can imagine that WHY these lies occur about me -- as also about others on the Right -- is that we aren't suffering,nor supporting, indoctrinations about Barack Obama and/or the Democrat Left. Also, as to those of us who do not agree that there is something in the area of "marriage" that involves being "gay," I guess the Left just has no context to grasp other than to call people names of whatever seems useful to them while revealing they're both liars and idiots in doing so.

So, I write again, no wonder Hollywood throws money at that: there's grubby profits to be had by lying about other people. They throw money at some people walking Santa Monica Boulevard, too.

Nancy Pelosi LIKES it, she really, really LIKES it! Finally, an Imaginary Energy Bill that Pelosi can really get excited about, imaginary drilling that avoids those messy details of reality! The Democrats get to say they're drilling while not drilling but imagining they are drilling, saying they are, but are not.

Our Democrat-Pelosi-Led House of Representatives passes a "no energy exploration" bill that declares they're "for drilling" (petroleum exploration and development) while they are not but saying they are. If you can make any sense of this, then you are among the Gang of 10 20, Republicans who fell for the ruse and joined in the Democrats' mind game. Which is invisible. Also a game. It is "HR 6899".

Democrats Pass Hoax Drilling Bill by Michelle Malkin

No-Energy Nancy's Phony Energy Plan by Marlo Lewis on National Review Online

Today's Greenwire (subscription required) reports that the House is expected to vote as soon as tomorrow on Democratic legislation that would "allow drilling more than 100 miles from the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, and as close to 50 miles from the shore if coastal states agree to it."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is spearheading this legislation -- an obvious sign that the Green Left's longstanding opposition to drilling has become a political liability for Democrats in this election cycle.

However, although Pelosi appears to be bowing to political and economic reality, her proposed "compromise" is a cynical ploy that no self-respecting supply-sider will touch with a 2,000-foot oil rig.

Our friends at the Institute for Energy Research (IER) posted a devastating exposé of the Pelosi plan. As announced last week, the plan would:

-- Permanently ban access to about 97 percent of the undersea oil lying within 50 miles of the California coast.

-- Continue the ban on energy production in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico.

-- Impose a brand-new ban on oil and gas leases in Alaska's coastal waters out to 50 miles.

-- Not allow states that approve new leases beyond 50 miles to share royalties with the federal government, thus stripping any financial incentive for states to stand up to environmental pressure groups, who will continue to agitate against any new oil and gas operations offshore.

The plan also includes poison pill provisions that President Bush is on record as opposing, such as new taxes on oil companies and a first-ever nationwide renewable-energy production quota for the electric power sector.

Nothing puts Pelosi's charade in clearer focus, though, than IER's charts showing how much oil the plan would lock up off the U.S. West coast. By banning new leases out to 50 miles, the Pelosi plan would permanently deny access to 100 percent of the technically recoverable oil off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, Northern California, and Central California, plus 95 percent of the oil off the coast of Southern California.

Pro-drilling lawmakers on the Hill would be well advised to wave these charts in front of the television cameras as often as possible...

(Continued, with graphics -- )